FOR without NEXT error message points to incorrect place

[MrTAToad]

I've noticed that the above error message doesn't usually point to the offending FOR statement (and usually chosens a completely inappropriate line) - would it be possible to make it slightly more accurate ?

[FutureCow]

Can you put a short piece of example code?

[MrTAToad]

The best I can get (with a small example) is :

Code (glbasic) Select Expand

FOR a=1 TO 3
WHILE 1
FOR b=1 TO 3 <- Error is regarded to be here
NEXT
WEND

With the error

[FutureCow]

I can confirm I get the error too - it seems to be evaluating the FOR/NEXT loops from the top down rather than the inner loop outwards.

[Kitty Hello]

Yes. It's on the bug list.