G.A.C.K. (gaming app construction kit) > Feedback
I'm not sure if this it's a bug
(1/1)
mentalthink:
I guys I hvae this function in my code, but I look something extrange the part I "mark" with here... It's a bug?¿ becuase the compiler seems understand like Ok, the line on I have self.xplosion_Y% , but draw anim don't have all this num of parameters and it's only this instruction...
Really i don't know if it's a problem but I think it's something extrange it's the same if I put only a number in a line, the compiler have to say something. ins't?¿----
Thanks and sorry if this not it's a problem, but I preffer advise for in a future can complicate somethin internal in GLbasic...
--- Code: (glbasic) ---FUNCTION explode_Enemy_Class1:
LOCAL max_Value% = 32
STATIC speed_Xplosion% = 8
IF self.val_energyhasEne%<=0
IF self.val_Seq_Enemy_Exp < self.max_value_Explosion
//This it's a Simple Counter for Move the Missile
DEC self.xplosion_X%
//Paint each Frame of the Sequence
INC self.val_Seq_Enemy_Exp,0.5
DRAWANIM self.enemies_how_Explode , _
self.val_Seq_Enemy_Exp% , _
self.xplosion_X% , _
self.xplosion_Y%
// PRINT "Explosion ActivadA"+self.val_Seq_Enemy_Exp, self.xplosion_X% , _
self.xplosion_Y% <<< HERE!!!!!
ENDIF
ENDIF
ENDFUNCTION
--- End code ---
mentalthink:
Hey guys I reply to myself, I search a curios and I think a problem
If you write this...
// PRINT "Explosion ActivadA"+self.val_Seq_Enemy_Exp, self.xplosion_X% , _
self.xplosion_Y% <<< HERE!!!!!
The compiler don't say nothing but if you write this ... focus in the missing , _
// PRINT "Explosion ActivadA"+self.val_Seq_Enemy_Exp, self.xplosion_X%
self.xplosion_Y% <<< HERE!!!!!
In the second case I get a compiler error-.---
I think the compiler when we write Comments, if we leave , _ the compiler undestand we are doing a carry in the line...
Well this I can say, perhaps this can cause problems to someone , be carefull !!!!
Regards,
kanonet:
I think its ok, that the compiler thinks your comment goes to next line too. - But if it does, the IDE should also mark 2nd line as a comment. So current behaviour is not 100% correct IMHO.
mentalthink:
Thanks Kano really you have reason the compiler will be think the next line it¡s a comment, but Really don't is... well I think the Masters have to decide about this, perhaps can be used like a trick for put on and off wuickly some lines of code...
:booze: Thanks for your reply kano.
erico:
I´d like to help Mental, but I really have no idea what is going on on that code :(
I think it is going to be a few years till I even get what a function is up to.
Anyways, I´m around here if anything I can help is up to. ;)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
Go to full version